I was quite worried about yesterday's History of Christian Mission (HCM) exam. Mike is a very nice lecturer and I enjoyed aspects of the way he teaches, like his use of the Socratic method and the way that he gives you the opportunity to reflect on the ideas you've been learning about in class (a rare thing at Bible college). However, there were certain things that were frustrating about his lectures. Firstly, sometimes he would forget to finish the lecture he started the week before. Secondly, sometimes he would skip over whole sections of his outline, saying, “You don't need to know that” which would be fine if you didn't really need to know that but then you come to revising for the exams and you look over the past papers and realise that maybe you did. Thirdly, he assumes that you will do reading outside of class to fill in the blanks which, at Bible college, is completely unrealistic given the current workload.
I think the main problem is the disparity between Mike In Class and Mike the Academic Who is Going to Mark My Essays and Exams; it completely messes with your expectations. And so, faced with the prospect of another Mike exam for HCM, I was pretty apprehensive.
HCM is a very valuable subject though. I have to say that I didn't go into the Diploma of Bible and Missions with an enormous desire to learn about missions. A lot of people do—a lot of people do the Diploma because they're interested in doing mission work overseas—but I'm not interested in overseas mission. Just for your information, the Dip B&M is comprised of the following subjects:
(I forget where Preaching 1A fits in—B&M-ers technically aren't allowed to do it but this year the Principal gave us permission with certain conditions. I decided not to do it though—I used the extra hour to go to work at MM.)
I reckon if you can afford to take a year off to go study at Bible College, the Diploma is a great thing to do. Not only does it help you to learn to read your Bible better but it introduces you to a whole wealth of Biblical scholarship and Christian history which is good to be aware of.
Hence History of Christian Mission. As I said before, I'm not hugely interested in mission but I came to really enjoy HCM because it made me aware of how missions has been done in the past (from the pillar saints [these were the guys who spent years on end standing on top of pillars] to the monks to the Crusades [which were more massacres than missions] to William Carey and the Serampore Trio to the World Council of Churches, the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization and the whole conciliar movement which totally changed the meaning of the word “ecumenism”.
I know now why monaticism became so popular in the medieaval period. I know now why Muslims hate the west so much. I know now why there are problems with each of the principles of accommodation, contextualisation and indigenisation need to be treated carefully. I know now why people get apprehensive when you start talking about social justice as being part of mission. And I know now why the mention of evangelism provokes so much guilt and wrong thinking in our contemporary Christian culture (a lot of it stems back to Donald McGavran who came up with the Homogenous Unit Principle and his strategy of Church Growth).
Anyway, God (and Mike) was kind to me. I had only studied
and I still managed to answer 5 questions fairly decently. They were:
Now it's just Biblical Theology and Doctrine 1 to go ...
A way of funding writing in the future: pitch and idea and get people to support it.
Place where you can hire play equipment for parties, etc.
How to recalibrate the home button on your iPhone.
Unsolicited manuscripts accepted by Pan Macmillan with certain conditions.
Thought Balloon is a group blog in which the writers tackle a new theme every week? month? with one-page scripts. This URL is for their Phonogram ones.
How to sew a zipper on a knitted garment.
Issues organised by tale.
|
|
Disqus comments
Other comments